Team production and gift exchange
Team production can be influenced by many factors and all three articles shed light on different ways people are influenced. In today’s society, most careers offer financial incentives to increase productivity which was stated in “The Power of Altruism”. One example of the financial incentive would be giving employees wage increases or bonuses if they complete a quota. This idea creates the “what’s in it for me?” mentality. People tend to act on self-interest instead of helping others and being kind, and by doing so makes actions a form of economic transactions. The idea of gift exchange goes against the idea of financial incentives and allows people to receive a different form of incentives.
There are many different ways to increase productivity in schools and in the work place. Let’s say that some key aspects in improving production it to track the amount of time you spend on tasks, create self-imposed deadlines, minimize interruptions, and support your team members. If you are working on a group project that involves research, for this example let’s say the topic is what is the best way to cook steak, you should first meet with your team to discuss the topic. You can grasp everyone’s standing knowledge on cooking and the experiences of each individual. Then you can break the research into specific sections that is suitable for each person. This doesn’t necessarily mean break up the research into equal parts, because someone that is more knowledgeable might want to take more responsibility because they are able to complete the task in a more efficient way. Some might say that this is not fair, because why should someone take on more work than others, but this can relate back to the second article. Dr. Markham said, “Try focusing on whether you’re meeting their individual needs instead of worrying whether each one is getting the exact same thing at the exact same time,” it would take someone that isn’t familiar with cooking longer to complete the task than the person who is experienced, making the overall project take longer. Relieving some pressure off team members will create more productivity within the group. The idea of “gift-giving” might not be as transparent, but if the more knowledgeable member opens discussion on the topic and helps those who don’t understand will allow the individual to obtain that knowledge at the end of the project. Creating self-imposed deadlines also might help the overall group because it allows you to feel confident in your work and make sure that you are staying on task. These deadlines will also allow your group to see that you are putting time and effort and that you are not free-riding on their work which will strengthen the group dynamic and trust. Some ways to minimize interruptions is not hold meetings unless absolutely necessary. Most things can be communicated through email or messages and this allows people to continue what they are doing and when they have the time, can look at those messages and keep them as records where they can reference if they have any questions. Gift-exchange can be simply helping your teammate with an issue they do not understand, taking on more responsibility, or asking if anyone needs help.
Well, a bit of humor to start off. I wish you hadn't used cooking steak as an example. I had to give up eating beef for health reasons. So I'd prefer not to be reminded about that. Let's change it to cooking chicken.
ReplyDeleteDeadlines are a funny thing to me, especially for research, if what you mean by a deadline is that you are done with your piece of the work. It's very hard to be able to predict in advance how long a task might take, if you haven't already done it before and/or others in the group haven't done it either. Now a deadline about communication as to how much progress has been made, that makes sense to me. But sometimes things will be difficult and they'll take longer than expected. If in this circumstance you impose a firm deadline for completion of the work, what you'll get is a result that's not very good.
Regarding your discussion of the situation where some people know more than others in advance and then how should effort be divided, you might want to consider repeat instances of the same situation. If over time once in a while the person will know more than others but at other times the person will be among those who are less knowledgeable, then rotating through the more labor intensive job and the less labor intensive jobs might produce fairness over time. If one person is always more knowledgeable and the others less so, perhaps the asymmetry in the work effort can be compensated in other ways outside of the project.
On these matters, in mid career while doing educational technology I enjoyed being with other dedicated professionals, the vast majority of whom didn't have an economics background. So I got my benefits from sidebar collegial interactions rather than from the project work we did. I don't want to say it all evened out. I never kept score that way. But I willingly participated. That might be as much as you can measure.
I'm sorry to hear that! I used steak because that was what I made for dinner that night. I think working in an efficient team, you want the final result to be the best it could possibly be, and that might mean someone who is more knowledgeable on the topic might have to do more work. I see that in group projects in school and team projects at work.
ReplyDelete